The Nanny State
So apparently DC has instituted seat belt traps. I found this out yesterday when I pulled onto Park from 14th, and was commanded to pull over by an officer in the middle of the street. I joined the other 5 cars pulled over to the side of the road and received my $50 punch in the balls. Should I have been wearing my seatbelt? Sure, I guess, but considering I was only a block from my house and doing 5 mph circling the block looking for parking, I thought I was safe from flying through my windshield.
What pisses me off more than the state charging me $50 for not protecting myself is the fact that, in this city, I'm 100% POSITIVE there is a better use of the time of three police officers. I would write a letter to the mayor's office, but no one would ever read it so I'm just going to bitch about it here. Obviously I'm going to contest it, not because I'm cheap or need the money, but because I'm an obstinate asshole who fucking hates the government.
References (3)
-
Response: NickNone -
Response: which script?does anyone know which software this page uses? -
Response: herpesAll about herpes.
Reader Comments (45)
I was in high school when seat belt laws went into effect, and my first car (63 impala) didn't have seat belts at all...
Georgia has the sodomy law, but should have added a condom addendum to that law in retrospect, as it did not prevent our quarterback from getting sued and getting herpes.
Click it or Ticket.
That's not just some slogan. It's a way of life. The district's way of life. So throw out that pepper spray, buckle up, put out your cigarette, wear your crash helmet, wait for the green walk-signal to activate, and then be sure to take the city-issue valium after a brick is thrown at you, you break your ankle in a pothole, and then you get shot.
We don't want you to get too frustrated. Your blood pressure could rise.
I run no risk of hurting myself or anyone else (including my car, which I refuse to allow anyone to drill holes in). I call shennanigans on this entirely unfair and arbitrary system of fineage.
Oh and Phil, I'm pretty sure Vick was doing a little more herp spreading than getting.
And speaking of Georgia, Dawgs taking it to the house.
Anyone who has ever driven on Benning Road or 295 knows that nobody does chicken-s#*t, predatory, revenue-generating ticketing better than DC, though. Safety? Psawh! It's all about getting paid, yo.
I was somewhat sympathetic to your complaints about the seatbelt violation. But after reading your additional complaints over the tickets you get for not registering your car in the District, I have to say that it's taking all of my emotional strength and self control to not think that maybe you're completely at fault here.
I'm not one to preach in favor of tickets, but honestly, there are plenty of things you could do to avoid the $100 here and the $50 there. First off -- register your car. If you live in the District, it might mean a jump in your insurance costs, but ultimately, that's the cost of living in an urban environment. If you don't like it, well, move to Virginia. Something tells me that those $100 tickets are probably getting close to equaling what you would be paying in increased insurance premiums if you registered your car here. As for the seatbelt violation, well, that's just crappy luck. But just as much as you can claim that it wasn't dangerous for you to be circling without it on, I know plenty of cell-phone-talking drivers who swear that they can both talk and drive at the same time without putting anyone at risk.
If you don't want to pull your weight in playing well with others--and you seem incapable of that--then move out of the city to someplace remote and rural where "I'm going to do whatever I want. Period." makes even a modicum of sense.
"You are completely at fault unless you comply with their rules, regardless of the presence or absence of logic and impact on your liberty." -DCist Martin
"If it was something personal, the Cops would have been right and well within their authority to fabricate charges against you to make you as miserable as possible." -ihatecops
Wow. That's not at all what I said. I don't see how registering your car in the state in which you reside at all infringes upon your liberty. Likewise, I don't see seatbelt traps as being infringements either. There is a logic to them both. If you could identify the lack of logic in either of those two examples, all power to you. And as for liberty, the truth of living in civilized society is that liberty is often balanced against the general good. When it comes to registering your car and wearing a seatbelt, I don't think the trade-off is that bad or that serious.
But oh, what the hell...
If you're conflating civil disobedience against deep social injustices with gaming your property taxes, which is what it sounds like you're trying to get to, then don't expect much sympathy or agreement.
I know, complex and nuanced moral and political thinking can hurt that tired brain and all. But here's a radical notion: one can adopt the views of the like of Thoreau, Gandhi, and King--or go more uber libertarian with the likes of Nozick--and not get to justifying treating the law as a sushi menu for you to casually cherry-pick from as you please, particularly when the motive is to save a buck or two.
In short: you gave a disingenuous and daft defense of petty, harmful, and selfish behavior.